![]() The lens corrections are far superior to LR. PhotoLab now includes some fairly substantial local masks and adjustments, so people who think of DXO as just a RAW developer should give it a look. DXO also pus the upgraded Elite version on sale for 25-30% off from time to time. That said, I'm still coming up top speed and the adjustments are not quite second nature as they were after years with LR.Īs an FYI, DXO is now bundling PhotoLab basic when you purchase DXO's iteration of the NIK plugins. I love PhotoLab's RAW output, and the Prime noise reduction is sublime. ![]() I also tried Affinity Photo, and was quite disappointed (but maybe some of my disappointment would have gone away if I put more time into it). In particular, I find noise reduction algorithms very, very effective. In terms of output quality, I found that I quickly reached the point where I got much better results with DxO than with LR. When facing the same choice, I opted for DxO PhotoLab, and I am very, very happy with it. Nikon has Capture NX and View NX which used to be pretty decent when I was in the Nikon universe. Besides Prime noise (the best I know) there're a few other nice features like working with the NIK-suite, Viewpoint (costs extra) and U-point technology.Īs a second RAW editor I use On1 Photo RAW, which has more or less the same functions as LR, but not matured yet.ĭepending on what camera you use, the manufacturer's software maybe a good choice. I use DXO Photolabs as my main RAW editor and what I didn't expect I don't miss the DAM function (they say they're working on it). Coming from Lightroom, it felt very intuitive to use, and I was able to get to good results faster than I did with Lightroom.Īffinity Photo is a light weight clone of PS and for me more than good enough as a replacement. That said, I got it on sale for $89 (you can probably find other sale coupons if you search around) and I've been very happy with it. Out of those three, I only have experience with DxO Photolab. A little practice re-enforces the tutorials. They have good online tutorials that explain how AP operates. If you're familiar with PS, then AP will be 95%+ the same in function and usage. ![]() A search here on 'Affinity' will help you find the solutions others like. There are folks here who don't get on with AP and have found other software that meets their needs better. In my case it's used for photo adjustments only. I'm a Widows user, so may have a bit more time than Mac folks.Īs far as Affinity Photo (AP) goes, I find it to be a fine alternative to PhotoShop (PS). I'm taking a big gulp of air and hoping good DAM & print SW becomes available before my version of LR doesn't work. I still use perpetual licenced LR for DAM purposes and to generate prints. The only program of that group I can comment on with experience is Affinity Photo. Affinity is like PS if that is what you are looking for. I read about people who say ACDSee's DAM is pretty good. No DAM and not even a temporary history stack to show your edits. I got it for mostly for Prime NR but I don't use it as much as I thought I would. You just won't be able to re-install it if your OS is Catalina. There is tons of info online but as usual there are pretty strong opinions about one product or the other. Appreciate any inputs to help me make a decision. My time with LR 6 is going to run out in future when the application stops working with newer versions of MacOSX and I am not willing to go for monthly perpetual payment for Adobe CC. DxO PhotoLab2, Affinity Photo, ACDSee Photo StudioĪnybody using either or all of these.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |